This
post came to me largely from various negative reviews of Laura
Antoniou's "The Marketplace." Yes, there were some typos
and such that an editor could have fixed- I didn't take issue with
those reviews. My issue is with comments that amounted to "I
don't like this. Let me give it 1 star because this isn't how I see
BDSM. It's military style- where's the love and romance?"
As
I vented to a friend recently: "people, read the blurb!" It
was obvious to me, as a person with decades experience in BDSM, that
this wasn't "BDSM erotic romance." But I digress. Reviews
aren't so much what I'm thinking about as types of BDSM.
BDSM
as an acronym is an umbrella term- bondage, discipline, domination,
sadism, masochism. And the various kinks, fetishes, interests that
are considered BDSM by people are mind-boggling. Of course even
there, there's disagreement. Like those fur-lined handcuffs? Those
would seem to be bondage, but plenty of "vanilla" or
mainstream couples use them.
Giving
a nod to Laura's books (at least the first one that it the only I've
managed to read so far), some dominants want their slaves trained in
such a way and there are probably those out there who would use a
service like that to find a BDSM slave. That isn't my Master however.
We had casual sex at first, started incorporating BDSM. Then He
collared me as His submissive. Love developed over the length of our
relationship and He married me legally when such became possible- ex
had been dragging his feet on giving me the divorce I wanted until he
was ready to remarry.
I
find what that reviewer called the "military style" of BDSM
intriguing. The people receiving slave training lived dorm-style.
They had schedules, items allowed them, etc. Their lives during
training were closely controlled. I might not want that IRL, but as
BDSM erotica, I found it arousing. However, I don't think it's as
rigid as all that- parts of the training where most definitely
formulated based on the person's strengths, weaknesses, what sort of
role they'd do best at.
Back
to IRL, I know that there are BDSM relationships (both monogamous and
polyamorous), where the sub was always naked, slept in a cage or
somehow bound. As a mother and an educator, I would point to that
"always"- there's always an exception to the rule :D. But
really, I've had people assume that I'm naked 24/7 because I live in
a "Master/slave" dynamic. Well no. There's a dog to take
outside. There's a teen to raise. There're home chores that are
unsafe to do while naked. It's a regular joke about "Are you
going to put something on to cook bacon?" because I do live
clothing optional lol.
With
ageplay, I've learned a ton about expectations and about them not
fitting every reality or relationship. It seems online or with people
who don't know much about ageplay, the term is synonymous with
infantlism or "adult diaper play." Of course that's not the
only type of ageplay, but it seems that that's the type that is most
taboo in people's minds, so it's the type thought of. In my Nanowrimo
WIP with the working title "Mommy," I'm experimenting with
a "Mommy/little girl" dynamic (I'm told by other authors
this makes my story different) as well as a "little" who
pictures herself more as a young teen (like maybe 13 or 14).
So
a message I've said before and in many ways, we need to learn that
our personal squicks shouldn't lead us into judgment of a BDSM
activity- consent is the key, whether that be a man consenting to be
tied to a bed or a woman consenting to her domme to give her an
enema... and millions of other things.
No comments:
Post a Comment